Which statement is true regarding drier-than-normal conditions in the continental United States?

The statement regarding drier-than-normal conditions in the continental United States being true is grounded in the understanding of both climatological patterns and the influence of regional weather phenomena. When it is observed that half the states experienced drier-than-normal conditions, this reflects the variability in precipitation patterns due to factors such as atmospheric circulation, El Niño or La Niña events, and seasonal climate trends.

Climate data often indicates that certain years or periods can see significant areas within the continental U.S. experiencing below-average rainfall due to prolonged dry spells, droughts, or changes in the jet stream. This variability means that while some areas may receive adequate rainfall, others may struggle, leading to the conclusion that a considerable number of states—about half—may indeed be experiencing drought conditions or below-average precipitation.

In contrast, statements suggesting that only a few states experienced dry conditions, asserting that high rainfall occurred in all states, or claiming that no states were affected do not align with the climatic reality often observed across the country. These positions would minimize the broader impact of climate variability and fail to capture the comprehensive view of weather patterns affecting multiple regions simultaneously. Therefore, acknowledging that approximately half the states experienced drier-than-normal conditions provides an accurate reflection of the situation concerning precipitation trends in the